THE BRITISH MONARCHY AND US REPUBLIC TODAY• • METHOD 2
Stage 1 - Introduction: presenting the documents
Similarities: Both documents deal with the evolution of US democracy..
Differences: The 1st document is a diagram showing the republic set up by the US constitution of 1787 after the US War of Independence (1775-1783) against Britain whereas the 2nd document is an article about the 1st US Black president by Michael Eric Dyson published in The Guardian on 5 November 2008, after Barack Obama’s election to the presidency.
Announce structure: In a first part, I will show that in 1787 the US was not a democracy using the diagram and in a second part I'll explain how it is one today thanks to the article.
Stage 2 - Analysing the documents
DESCRIBING - What you see (docs) |
INTERPRETING - What you know (notions) |
1. Firstly, the diagram shows the USA wasn’t really a democracy in 1787 | |
Many elections as
US voters elected: |
- Sovereignty of the people (def), representation of the people (def), a republic (def) |
2. Secondly, the article explains how the US became a democracy |
|
African-Americans were excluded until 1965 |
- Declaration of Indpence, 4 July 1776 against Britain's abuse of power |
Stage 3 - Concluding
Assess docs (reliable/biased justified): To conclude, these documents are reliable as we have their full references and the Guardian is a quality UK newspaper and unbiased as we can’t see the authors’ opinion (describes the US political system & gives facts).
Sum-up ideas These documents show how that the US republic didn’t start as a democracy but progressively became one although it took one century for African-Americans to become “real” citizens.
+ Open What about democracy not in a republic but in a monarchy like the UK?